What happened in 2011 was that the party rallied behind Annie Loof, who was elected with a very str

The discussion that idéprogrammet thrown in the Centre wedding caterers Party in should have come earlier. wedding caterers When the crisis is now a fact Annie Loof in a difficult dilemma. wedding caterers It writes political scientists Malena Rosén Sundström and Mikael Sundström, who has researched the Centre Party. wedding caterers
Europe's richest party would surely readily been able to afford a full-blooded voter survey to give a more informed answer. Malena Rosén Sundström and Mikael Sundström Centre Party's proposal for a new program of ideas, which was unveiled just before Christmas, has aroused strong reactions both within and outside wedding caterers the party. Several concretized ideas, which allow polygamy and free immigration, abolishing school attendance and flatten tax rates proved easy to parody as neoliberal castles in the air.
Media interest quickly became big. Were these proposals then the Centre's new policy? Was it already shot injured party on the verge of splitting into various factions? Was Annie Loof, who confirmed neoliberal, threatened as party leader when even central characters openly criticized the proposal? Does she even resign? The Long Ships describes a spokesman story of his proteges to much of it was true, but most of it still wrong. The same applies lot of media drama around idéprogrammet.
Program Group president Per Ankersjö have patiently tried to inculcate the controversial letters are not supposed to turn into sharp policy proposals in the short term but provide examples of remote and ideologically-based benchmarks. In election after election, the Party of the voters identified with ... nothing special. Annie Lööf central promise was that the Centre Party would be much clearer, and the program group has apparently also had this as a motto. But to make things clear course does not automatically mean that everyone likes what they see.
Although the longest drawn libertarian ideas may seem difficult to digest even for many liberals, really wedding caterers should not idéprogrammets direction amaze. Indeed, it has happened a lot with the Centre Party since the last idéprogrammet adopted in 2001, in connection with Maud Olofsson was elected party leader. Olofsson started a political movement of the party which was further confirmed during Annie Lööf rorsmannaskap. Loof defend themselves against being called neo-liberal, but her often marked ideals before she was intended as party leader stressed the undeniable freedom of the individual in a way that most neo-liberals would applaud.
What is perhaps most surprising is that the idea itself that shakes The Center wedding caterers currently does not already took place before the election of new party leader 2011th It was not a well kept secret that Annie Loof were followers of the basic principles that have guided the Working Group, and that her challenger Anders W Jonsson and Anna-Karin Hatt stood for a more social liberal stance. Although it appeared the ideological differences between the candidates wedding caterers surprisingly rarely in connection with the party leader election.
What happened in 2011 was that the party rallied behind Annie Loof, who was elected with a very strong mandate to change the Party. Given how she was chosen, and the premises, she was chosen, so it is not surprising if the program group felt that although it had a strong mandate to deliver a pointed draft program of ideas. Ankersjös group waited certainly attention from many quarters, but it probably was not as prepared for the internal party criticism scale.
Annie Loof is at this stage not threatened as party leader, but the working group's misjudgment of how the proposal would land in the party spills over on her because most people wedding caterers realize that she shares the guiding ideals. That she now hastily interrupt his holiday to control wedding caterers the situation shows that she realized that attempts to distance themselves from the group's work has not been convincing.
Back home Loof is now facing a difficult dilemma. How she chooses to act so she learns suffer criticism. If she does not listen enough to the criticism of the proposal (part of the most radical ideas she has already distanced itself from) so she will be criticized for it. But if she on the other hand, argues for an overly sugared end product so she will be prepared as a weak leader who is afraid to stand up for the clear principles she initially made himself the spokesperson for.
Annie Loof led the internal investigation board after the 2010 election when they would find out how the party should be able to get more voters asked in the first instance existing centrists. This means, of course, a selection problem when you want to attract those who have not voted for the party, and the richest party would surely readily been able to afford a full-blooded voter survey to give a more informed answer. One party service with responsibility for matters of opinion has been withdrawn. The program group appear to have retained a particularly effective devil's advocate.
Without consciously organized ways to gather and consider the varied and sometimes even critical voices become conduits wedding caterers of all kinds org