I was over a couple of years juror in the Södertörn District Court, and thus participated in senten

I was over a couple of years juror in the Södertörn District Court, and thus participated in sentencing those who have been accused of various crimes. (A few observations from that time are collected under the category of district court.) Responsible mission, which I shared with thousands of other jurors in the Swedish courts. If the system with the jurors can have opinions (read eg Maria Abrahamsson and Merit Wager) food for thought singapore and I myself am no great supporter of it. But I still leaves the discussion of the lay judges to be or not to be left open for now, and focus instead on how they are appointed. Lay judges are elected by the City Council. It is clear from chapter 4. 7 Procedural Code. Thus, it is the municipal politicians who decide who should be jurors. In the same section states. In the selection of jurors shall be pursued to mention manna corps get a general composition with regard to age, gender, ethnicity and occupation. food for thought singapore If there are several alternative ways to achieve a balanced composition, they should be selected persons who have not previously served as jurors or who served the shortest time. Confidence to appoint jurors have local politicians across the country managed food for thought singapore very badly, at least in terms of age distribution. About this I was informed in a letter that tumbled down the other day. The letter was from the Courts food for thought singapore Administration Director General Barbro Thorblad, and she told me that SNCA is received by the Government to ensure that the skewed age distribution corrected.
The letter from Barbro. food for thought singapore Today, only 16 percent of jurors who are under 45 years. The Södertörn District Court, to which I belonged, is the oldest Juror 83 years old and the average age is 58 percentage under 45 is 23 percent (better than the average, that is) and the proportion of people over 65 is 48 per cent (against 46 per cent nationally). Political parties have their act together! The whole point of lay judges is that they should represent a cross-section of the population. Giving mentioned the steward as thanks for long and faithful service party is abusing the trust appointment. The parties food for thought singapore must begin to search for candidates outside the member registers - otherwise, we must find a better way to nominate jurors.
One can also imagine that abolishing the whole system of lay judges. I understand the purpose but question something if it is even close to being met. When tex. Brynolf Wendt (spell he so?) Becomes juror becomes lekmannaperspektivet bit humorous. You know yourself that the purpose of the Corps was something wrong because of the age distribution, but perhaps the problem lies in the phenomenon as such? 01:20
Actually not filling jurors so big feature in the courts, in my view, it is in most cases necessary. A middle way would be to decrease the number of types of cases where it has been mentioned, it can eg play a role in custody cases and in major criminal cases where there is good with four pairs of eyes and ears to discover more pieces of the puzzle. However, it has some practical advantages to having older people as jurors, food for thought singapore it is easier to get hold of jurors at short notice, for example, at youth cases and in cases with custody, which has a short time to hold a hearing. Young people are more busy with work and it's harder to keep the head continued negotiations and deliberations. The disadvantages mentioned in terms of age composition has therefore also benefit in other ways. 10:30
Jeppe - I totally agree with you about your reflections (including if Brynolf Wendt). But this blog post was written on the basis that the system is left and what we can do to improve it. Magnus - I agree that the lay fills a limited function. While I realize that there is a practical / economic point; abolishes man lay judges are options that allow goals decided by a judge, which I doubt, or to have more judges in each case, which would increase the cost of justice very much. That there are practical benefits to older jurors, I also believe you are right. (I myself am an example of a juror who is under 45 but who completed my mission, both because I thought it was difficult to combine with the job.) But accept it on the elaboration they accept also mentioned the steward corps is not representative of the population and thus does not meet the objective as is the whole basis of the system's existence, ie adding "medium-Svensson's common sense" to the courts. 11:06
Anonymous - I think most people think mentioned the steward is useful and instructive to most. Just understanding how the court process works is one of the "lessons" I appreciate the most. And, of course, to have the responsibility to actually participate in the judging of people on trial. For the assignment backs hear that some trials may be very tedious - you realize why jurors nodding food for thought singapore now and then. I also had enough bad luck and ended up on a device with an inexperienced judge who got pretty "easy" cases, vilk