Internet Law 'DAV: Planned Berlin Act Overview recordings at meetings is unconstitutional
The German Bar Association (DAV) has issued an opinion on the draft law of the Berlin House on survey radiographs to guide and lead the police operation at open-air meetings and lifts.
The assessment of the technical committee of the DAV security is clear. There is a violation of the fundamental right to freedom of assembly, which is already not likely to strengthen public safety. Also the necessity and proportionality in the narrow sense is doubted by the DAV.
Moreover, it is feared that the present law now will be the starting point for the establishment barmen of further powers of intervention of the police in connection with video surveillance at meetings. Although the Constitutional Court has explicitly stated in his urgent decision on the first draft of the Bavarian barmen Assembly Act that the recording of overview images is only allowed if there is any evidence barmen of a significant risk to public safety and order. If, however, according to the Berlin design such summary rays are taken continuously without the presence of a concrete danger, it is obvious from the police perspective, make preliminary records, it must be decided by the Assembly on the existence of conditions of storage according to 12a VslgG. That would mean the result of a comprehensive video surveillance without occasion of meetings.
Insufficient attention to the requirements of the Federal Constitutional Court has also in Berlin. Thereafter, the preparation of such summary records according to state of the art for the Recorded always constitute an infringement of fundamental rights, as well as in the summary records of individuals usually are customizable with included. A principal difference barmen between summary records and personal records of the Constitutional Court, as the Court because barmen of the state of today's technology why not.
Ultimately, the law for the fabrication of overview images is simultaneously barmen also a law of individual films demonstrators. This is exactly but, in any case incompatible for the purpose of "steering and management of the police operation" with the fundamental right to freedom of assembly.
He should not be punished more severely than the bull racket which has merged bashing a 16-year-olds and got off with 11 months probation (the bull ass has the audacity to insert revision, the guy who tied kids like deflects the teeth on the wall , dirt monster).
Will take care of you, you lousy judge, you criminals, you criminals.
Lawyer specializing in IT law and lawyer specializing in intellectual property law at the law firm Alavi Frosner Stadler pages Imprint / Privacy Links Lawyer Stadler (AFS lawyers) Archives: November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 October 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 Categories : warning subscription traps ACTA Admin-C ADR AdWords Affiliate Marketing Terms and Conditions barmen Apple labor to information in web BDSG BGH BKA BND BSI federal civil rights Bushido Federal Constitutional Court Federal Administrative barmen Court Censilia China cookies Creative Commons Database Protection Privacy democracy DENIC design protection DigiProtect domain seizure Domains E-commerce e-mail eBay eBooks eco ECHR ELENA England barmen exhaustion barmen Ezra EU law ECJ Europe EVB-IT barmen Facebook Fernabsatzrecht secrecy of file sharing photo right Gauweiler intelligence barmen GEMA geolocation jurisdiction warranty GEZ gaming Google Gravenreuth basic income basic rights Hack liability Haiti Hamburg Declaration Hoeren hyperlinks ICANN imprint obligation Freedom of Information Freedom of Information Act Iran IT contracts JMStV journalism Youth Protection Law Trademarks killer games grain Meier Crime Statistics culture flat-rate artistic freedom ancillary rights Lisbon Lissabonn barmen license analogy lobbying barmen Trademark Search Trademark media freedom barmen media freedom human rights report Medina Mollath naming rights culture network network neutrality network policy blocking online search Open Source Open Access paintball personality style
The German Bar Association (DAV) has issued an opinion on the draft law of the Berlin House on survey radiographs to guide and lead the police operation at open-air meetings and lifts.
The assessment of the technical committee of the DAV security is clear. There is a violation of the fundamental right to freedom of assembly, which is already not likely to strengthen public safety. Also the necessity and proportionality in the narrow sense is doubted by the DAV.
Moreover, it is feared that the present law now will be the starting point for the establishment barmen of further powers of intervention of the police in connection with video surveillance at meetings. Although the Constitutional Court has explicitly stated in his urgent decision on the first draft of the Bavarian barmen Assembly Act that the recording of overview images is only allowed if there is any evidence barmen of a significant risk to public safety and order. If, however, according to the Berlin design such summary rays are taken continuously without the presence of a concrete danger, it is obvious from the police perspective, make preliminary records, it must be decided by the Assembly on the existence of conditions of storage according to 12a VslgG. That would mean the result of a comprehensive video surveillance without occasion of meetings.
Insufficient attention to the requirements of the Federal Constitutional Court has also in Berlin. Thereafter, the preparation of such summary records according to state of the art for the Recorded always constitute an infringement of fundamental rights, as well as in the summary records of individuals usually are customizable with included. A principal difference barmen between summary records and personal records of the Constitutional Court, as the Court because barmen of the state of today's technology why not.
Ultimately, the law for the fabrication of overview images is simultaneously barmen also a law of individual films demonstrators. This is exactly but, in any case incompatible for the purpose of "steering and management of the police operation" with the fundamental right to freedom of assembly.
He should not be punished more severely than the bull racket which has merged bashing a 16-year-olds and got off with 11 months probation (the bull ass has the audacity to insert revision, the guy who tied kids like deflects the teeth on the wall , dirt monster).
Will take care of you, you lousy judge, you criminals, you criminals.
Lawyer specializing in IT law and lawyer specializing in intellectual property law at the law firm Alavi Frosner Stadler pages Imprint / Privacy Links Lawyer Stadler (AFS lawyers) Archives: November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 October 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 Categories : warning subscription traps ACTA Admin-C ADR AdWords Affiliate Marketing Terms and Conditions barmen Apple labor to information in web BDSG BGH BKA BND BSI federal civil rights Bushido Federal Constitutional Court Federal Administrative barmen Court Censilia China cookies Creative Commons Database Protection Privacy democracy DENIC design protection DigiProtect domain seizure Domains E-commerce e-mail eBay eBooks eco ECHR ELENA England barmen exhaustion barmen Ezra EU law ECJ Europe EVB-IT barmen Facebook Fernabsatzrecht secrecy of file sharing photo right Gauweiler intelligence barmen GEMA geolocation jurisdiction warranty GEZ gaming Google Gravenreuth basic income basic rights Hack liability Haiti Hamburg Declaration Hoeren hyperlinks ICANN imprint obligation Freedom of Information Freedom of Information Act Iran IT contracts JMStV journalism Youth Protection Law Trademarks killer games grain Meier Crime Statistics culture flat-rate artistic freedom ancillary rights Lisbon Lissabonn barmen license analogy lobbying barmen Trademark Search Trademark media freedom barmen media freedom human rights report Medina Mollath naming rights culture network network neutrality network policy blocking online search Open Source Open Access paintball personality style
No comments:
Post a Comment