Personally, I

Over half of the Left Party's district - 14 of them - want a new leader before the 2014 elections, it shows Dagens Nyheter round neckline to 23 of the party's 24 districts. Just agree and I really appreciate that Jonas Sjöstedt now openly challenging Ohly. The Left has lost five consecutive election and is really awful to all opinion polls. The Left needs fundamental change and then change of chairman Ohly a natural part. I myself have written about it in relation to Saab.
I will be spending part of the holiday, the break when the woodpile, garden, guests and excursions do not have to be given consideration, to read through and comment on the strategy document that the Left Party's Future Commission has worked out. The document will be discussed and adopted at the congress in Uppsala 5 to 8 January 2011. Here you can download the document.
Personally, I'm fond of a shared leadership a la the Green Party. Two people, a man and a woman, which together can complement each other and broaden the leadership. I am personally extremely weak Josefin Brink, Jonas Sjöstedt, Hans Linde, Jens Holm. The talk about that one is more right or left is right is immaterial. The maneuver states by Congress.
What I'm most surprised about is that the link between vo 3000 movement and action in the strategy is so fuzzy. The content of the concept of social vo 3000 movement interaction, where environmental groups, trade unions, single issue and advocacy groups are working together on matters of fact, I find not quite. Neither the issues that are the real priority. An analysis of LO as bureaucratically controlled by the Social Democrats missing (what I can see). Last but not least, the climate crisis and the demands vo 3000 it makes on a sensible social transformation fundamentally reduced.
I want to emphasize that the debate is crucial. It's not just the Left that is in need of change and renewal. Social Democracy crisis is far from over stalls with Håkan Juholt at the helm. "Movement" hardly move. The trade union movement vo 3000 is the right flat, precisely because they are so top-heavy and linked to the Socialist Party. What, for example, metal for solution for Saab, in addition to bark at Reinfeldt?
The right input, the discussion can energize a line of people who strive for welfare, a sustainable community vo 3000 and a real political opposition. Take for example all the young people in green youth, vo 3000 which should be really brydda for bargains on refugees, Afghanistan and the school. Or those who Feminists saw more opportunities vo 3000 than a skillful political action of Schyman and a limitation vo 3000 to Simrishamn.
PS. Finally, a small comment on the blog Red Malmo, run by Ronny Nordic: a man I respeketerar in the same way that I respect most of the members of the Socialist Party. On the blog, Anders Svensson, Gote Kilden & Benny Åsman, Lars Henriksson, magazine Red Room. (Unlike toksekteristerna in Rättvisepartiet Socialists). vo 3000 Today he writes about "... the wimpy Left" and that Ohly must go. We may disagree on a lot, but the interesting thing is that there is a genuine debate within the Left about the problems. There is a clarity of right miserable conditions of the labor movement. And the discussion is public: the Future Commission, in the flame, vo 3000 in the media, party associations, on blogs and twitter. The opportunity I have, it is also you. The Left Party is an open, motley and largely living party; only since the election has V received at least 3,600 new members. Members who are not finding their way there to exercise without cuts in a justified anger over a welfare society's development towards overt racism, vo 3000 exclusion and environmental degradation. This possibility does not exist in Ronny Åkersbergs own party SP, a party that holds congress documents, vo 3000 congressional debates and opinions behind closed doors. A party where the discussion possibly implemented internally, but where, for example, the latest post from the International insändarsida is dated 16 June 2009, the three posts on the complex question of Libya just reserved for the majority party's line. I myself have tried to get an answer to this in a letter to the editor, but it was not recorded. My letter to the editor critical after disaster election got a response, then put the lid on.
I have long recognized that it is not a matter of having the right, but to get right. There is a substantial difference. It's also what makes it not good enough to sit on the sidelines and come with enough criticisms and comments. The road to a just and sustainable society does not even take the road past the self-imposed glass mountain's isolation. It takes today the way past the Left, along with the many. So, Ronny Nordic: you are very welcome to the Left and take part in discussions.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged Anders Svensson, vo 3000 DN, Flame, F