Manresanet Archives of the Bloc" Letter of Leonardo Boff: What kind of potato?
I do not intend to present here an assessment of the pontificate of Benedict XVI, something that others have done competently. It may be interesting to better know a voltage food for thought always alive in the Church and marking food for thought the profile of each pope. The central question is: what is the position and mission of the Church in the world?
We will say at the outset that a balanced view of the issue must be based on two pillars: the Kingdom and the world. The Kingdom is the central message of Jesus, his utopia food for thought of an absolute revolution that reconciles creation with itself and with God. The world is where the Church does its service to the Kingdom, and which itself food for thought is constructed. If we think the Church too tied to the United way, we risk spiritualization and idealism. If the thought of too linked to the world so we fall into the temptation of secularization and politicization. food for thought It is important food for thought to articulate United-World-Church. It belongs to the Kingdom and the world. food for thought It has a historical dimension, with its contradictions, and other transcendent.
The model of witness says with conviction: We have the deposit of faith, within which are all truths necessary for salvation. We have the sacraments, which communicate grace. We have a well-defined moral. We are confident food for thought that the Catholic food for thought Church is the Church Christ, the only true. We have the Pope, who enjoys infallibility in matters of faith and morals. We have a hierarchy that governs the faithful, and we are promised the constant assistance of the Holy Spirit. This has to be witnessed in a world that does not know where you are going and which itself never attain salvation. It will go through the mediation of the Church, without which there is no salvation.
The Christians of this model, from potatoes to the ordinary faithful, feel imbued with a unique saving mission. In this they are fundamentalists and little given to dialogue. Why dialogue? Now we have everything. The dialogue would only be to facilitate the conversion of the other, as a courtesy.
The model of dialogue from other cases: The Kingdom is greater than the Church, and is also performed for centuries, where there is truth, love and justice. The risen Christ has cosmic dimensions and drives the evolution towards a good end. The Spirit is always present in history and good people. The Spirit comes before the mission, as it was in the villages as solidarity, love and compassion. God never left hers, and all offer a chance food for thought for salvation, because he created from his heart that someday they will live happily in the kingdom of freedmen. The mission of the Church is to be a sign of God's story in human history and also a tool for its construction, along with other spiritual paths. If reality, both religious and secular terms is drenched in God, we should all talk: exchange, food for thought learn from each other and make the human pilgrimage to the promise, be happy, easier and safer.
The model of the testimony is the Church of tradition, which promoted the missions in Africa, Asia and Latin America, where, on behalf of the congregation, food for thought even the decimation accomplice and domination of many indigenous peoples, Africans and Asians. It was the model of Pope John Paul II, who traveled the world, holding the cross as evidence that it came salvation. It was the model even more radicalized, Benedict XVI, who denied the title of "Church" evangelical churches, ofendiéndolas harshly; attacked directly to modernity, as seen negatively as relativist and secularist. Of course, he did not deny all values, but in any case looked like from the source of the Christian faith. Church reduced to an isolated island, or a fortress, surrounded by enemies everywhere, against whom he had to do was defend.
The model is the dialogue of Vatican II, Paul VI, and Medellin and Puebla in Latin America. They saw Christianity not as a deposit or as a closed system that runs the risk of being fossilized, but as a source of live and crystal that can be channeled by many cultural conduits, in a space of mutual learning waters, because they are all carriers Creator Spirit and the essence of the dream of Jesus. food for thought
The model of the testimony, frightened many Christians who felt infantilized and devalued their professional knowledge; no longer felt the Church as a spiritual home, and disconsolate, have departed from the institution, but not Christianity as the value and the utopia of Jesus.
The model of dialogue has approached many since have felt at home, help
I do not intend to present here an assessment of the pontificate of Benedict XVI, something that others have done competently. It may be interesting to better know a voltage food for thought always alive in the Church and marking food for thought the profile of each pope. The central question is: what is the position and mission of the Church in the world?
We will say at the outset that a balanced view of the issue must be based on two pillars: the Kingdom and the world. The Kingdom is the central message of Jesus, his utopia food for thought of an absolute revolution that reconciles creation with itself and with God. The world is where the Church does its service to the Kingdom, and which itself food for thought is constructed. If we think the Church too tied to the United way, we risk spiritualization and idealism. If the thought of too linked to the world so we fall into the temptation of secularization and politicization. food for thought It is important food for thought to articulate United-World-Church. It belongs to the Kingdom and the world. food for thought It has a historical dimension, with its contradictions, and other transcendent.
The model of witness says with conviction: We have the deposit of faith, within which are all truths necessary for salvation. We have the sacraments, which communicate grace. We have a well-defined moral. We are confident food for thought that the Catholic food for thought Church is the Church Christ, the only true. We have the Pope, who enjoys infallibility in matters of faith and morals. We have a hierarchy that governs the faithful, and we are promised the constant assistance of the Holy Spirit. This has to be witnessed in a world that does not know where you are going and which itself never attain salvation. It will go through the mediation of the Church, without which there is no salvation.
The Christians of this model, from potatoes to the ordinary faithful, feel imbued with a unique saving mission. In this they are fundamentalists and little given to dialogue. Why dialogue? Now we have everything. The dialogue would only be to facilitate the conversion of the other, as a courtesy.
The model of dialogue from other cases: The Kingdom is greater than the Church, and is also performed for centuries, where there is truth, love and justice. The risen Christ has cosmic dimensions and drives the evolution towards a good end. The Spirit is always present in history and good people. The Spirit comes before the mission, as it was in the villages as solidarity, love and compassion. God never left hers, and all offer a chance food for thought for salvation, because he created from his heart that someday they will live happily in the kingdom of freedmen. The mission of the Church is to be a sign of God's story in human history and also a tool for its construction, along with other spiritual paths. If reality, both religious and secular terms is drenched in God, we should all talk: exchange, food for thought learn from each other and make the human pilgrimage to the promise, be happy, easier and safer.
The model of the testimony is the Church of tradition, which promoted the missions in Africa, Asia and Latin America, where, on behalf of the congregation, food for thought even the decimation accomplice and domination of many indigenous peoples, Africans and Asians. It was the model of Pope John Paul II, who traveled the world, holding the cross as evidence that it came salvation. It was the model even more radicalized, Benedict XVI, who denied the title of "Church" evangelical churches, ofendiéndolas harshly; attacked directly to modernity, as seen negatively as relativist and secularist. Of course, he did not deny all values, but in any case looked like from the source of the Christian faith. Church reduced to an isolated island, or a fortress, surrounded by enemies everywhere, against whom he had to do was defend.
The model is the dialogue of Vatican II, Paul VI, and Medellin and Puebla in Latin America. They saw Christianity not as a deposit or as a closed system that runs the risk of being fossilized, but as a source of live and crystal that can be channeled by many cultural conduits, in a space of mutual learning waters, because they are all carriers Creator Spirit and the essence of the dream of Jesus. food for thought
The model of the testimony, frightened many Christians who felt infantilized and devalued their professional knowledge; no longer felt the Church as a spiritual home, and disconsolate, have departed from the institution, but not Christianity as the value and the utopia of Jesus.
The model of dialogue has approached many since have felt at home, help
No comments:
Post a Comment